The University of Nottingham

The University of Nottingham

THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM

Centre for Risk & Insurance Studies

Life Insurers' Financial Strength

Life assurance companies' returns to Financial Services Authority:
a preliminary survey

by Chris O'Brien, Director, Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies,
Nottingham University Business School

A preliminary survey of life assurance companies' returns to the Financial Services Authority confirms that policyholders should expect lower bonuses as a result of reduced investment returns.

The survey covers the 20 top with profit funds1. It shows that many companies have continued to increase their funds under management, and that, at the end of 2000, the free assets ratio2 of many companies was lower than in 1999.

Bonuses to with profit policyholders reflect, inter alia, investment returns and the surpluses which companies have. Companies have approaches to smooth payouts to policyholders. However, the FTSE 100 index reached a peak of 6930 on 30 December 1999 and is now (9 August 2001) about 20% below this. It is against this background that, not unexpectedly, many companies have already reduced bonuses.

The industry, through the Association of British Insurers, has recognised the need for improved communication with policyholders; and FSA, as part of its with profits review, is looking for better information for policyholders about the progress of their investments. The actuarial profession has also been considering improvements to the transparency of with profits business.

The annual returns which companies make to the FSA set out, inter alia, their assets and liabilities, and the required solvency margin. These can be used to calculate a number of ratios. This note refers to the "free assets ratio"2 Different ratios have different characteristics and none is ideal. We note that companies may have access to other assets to support their business. As regards the liabilities, the regulations prescribe a number of calculations, using a methodology which many would say is prudent but also artificial. Furthermore, the regulations require that the assumptions used are also prudent, leading to margins in the calculation. We need to recognise that companies carry out the calculations in different ways, and make different assumptions. Companies also have varying reassurance arrangements, which can affect the figures.

In the year 2000 there were a number of changes in the Insurance Companies Regulations, which, in many cases, have effectively meant that the degree of prudence in calculating the liabilities has increased. The outcome is that many companies have seen the value attributed to their liabilities increase. Liabilities will have also increased as a result of lower rates being used to discount future claims, as a result of reductions in rates of interest (for example, the yield on the 15-year gilt index reduced from 5.22% to 4.60%). Also taking into account that assets will have been affected by reductions in share prices (the FT-All Share Index fell from 3141 to 2964 in 2000), it is not surprising that the free assets ratios of many companies have reduced.

Bearing in mind that the standard valuation of assets and liabilities typically contains significant margins for prudence, the regulations allow companies to use "implicit items" (typically what is referred to as "future profits") in certain circumstances. Many companies choose not to do so, or to use less than the maximum amount that would be permitted.

Simple comparisons of free assets ratios should therefore be treated with extreme caution.

Nevertheless, this preliminary survey confirms that changed economic conditions have had an impact on life offices, and it is also to be expected that they will affect policyholders through bonus rates.

Chris O'Brien
9 August 2001

1 The with profits life offices with the highest admissible assets at the end of 1999

2 Using form 9 of the returns: line 21 (long-term fund admissible assets) plus line 22 (other assets) minus liabilities*, minus required solvency margin, expressed as a proportion of liabilities. *Liabilities are the sum of lines 23 (mathematical reserves) and 24 (other liabilities).

Download text in PDF format Download PDF file

Financial data on insurance companies is also provided by Standard & Poors

Free assets of with profits offices
Note that figures from lines 21 to 41 are expressed in £m.
Long-term
admissible
assets
Other
assets
Math
reserves
Other
liabilities
Future
profits
Required
solvency
margin
Free
assets
ratio1
Free
assets
ratio
excl implicit
Form 9: line:
21
22
23
24
31
41
items1
2000
AXA Equity & Law L.A. 11409.643 9.203 8876.729 197.937 408.241 21.3% 21.3%
CGNU Life Assurance2 11537.211 89.396 9403.288 345.681 607.943 13.0% 13.0%
Clerical Medical Inv Grp 20247.844 70.784 16056.187 470.182 556.516 19.6% 19.6%
Co-operative Ins Soc 20092.069 16220.136 1409.345 695.204 10.0% 10.0%
Commercial Union L.A. 13540.274 10961.481 330.240 440.908 16.0% 16.0%
Eagle Star Life Ass 11065.327 1021.341 10398.619 399.731 397.241 8.3% 8.3%
Equitable Life Ass 34257.185 32894.405 730.961 1000.000 1220.923 1.2% -1.8%
Friends Prov Life Office3 23377.896 215.000 19798.733 1385.868 600.000 756.165 10.6% 7.8%
Legal & General Ass 39189.433 763.500 33401.856 945.884 1276.814 12.6% 12.6%
National Provident Life4 11388.274 609.659 10261.627 724.206 417.035 5.4% 5.4%
Norwich Union L & P 33562.608 648.946 28229.285 606.805 1266.423 14.2% 14.2%
Pearl Assurance 17238.458 14198.277 609.366 604.328 12.3% 12.3%
Prudential Assurance 82700.004 66762.648 3991.519 2804.400 12.9% 12.9%
Royal & Sun All L & P 12130.000 10.102 10472.249 306.513 491.418 8.1% 8.1%
Scottish Equitable 11436.867 142.983 10302.872 219.945 375.000 486.238 9.0% 5.4%
Scottish Mutual Ass 13533.538 114.079 12513.942 744.261 300.000 438.110 1.9% -0.4%
Scottish Widows plc5 23065.572 238.646 19128.499 441.449 813.990 14.9% 14.9%
Standard Life Ass6 60063.084 48387.082 1163.588 1937.809 17.3% 17.3%
Sun Alliance & Lon Ass 9702.568 164.626 8732.362 469.888 78.000 390.289 3.8% 3.0%
Sun Life Assurance 12896.410 16.323 11135.345 149.336 515.627 9.9% 9.9%
Total 472434.265 4114.588 398135.622 15642.705 2353.000 16525.622 11.7% 11.2%
1999
AXA Equity & Law L.A. 11138.357 9.225 8020.244 201.350 375.687 31.0% 31.0%
CGU Life Assurance 11831.592 84.562 8703.046 348.556 498.270 26.1% 26.1%
Clerical Medical Inv Grp 18704.929 34.448 15198.641 496.118 540.111 16.0% 16.0%
Co-operative Ins Soc 20146.616 14903.519 1556.802 651.046 18.4% 18.4%
Commercial Union L.A. 12277.442 8733.850 341.884 361.451 31.3% 31.3%
Eagle Star Life Ass 10651.791 985.947 9759.049 339.135 381.236 11.5% 11.5%
Equitable Life Ass 33110.903 29933.754 241.122 925.000 1114.310 9.1% 6.0%
Friends Prov Life Office 20263.580 215.000 15148.391 1514.700 650.000 597.565 23.2% 19.3%
Legal & General Ass 38558.032 805.000 31283.567 946.584 1184.088 18.5% 18.5%
National Provident Inst 14730.590 130.000 13398.910 637.657 351.497 421.796 5.4% 2.9%
Norwich Union L & P 33870.597 627.472 26917.149 544.655 1218.659 21.2% 21.2%
Pearl Assurance 17688.059 13717.382 212.126 582.234 22.8% 22.8%
Prudential Assurance 81848.967 59235.459 4424.878 2557.319 24.6% 24.6%
Royal & Sun All L & P 11857.257 10.155 9658.591 295.097 443.568 14.8% 14.8%
Scottish Equitable 10573.344 161.264 9011.777 115.702 440.578 12.8% 12.8%
Scottish Mutual Ass 11823.417 240.064 9400.872 800.050 315.763 15.2% 15.2%
Scottish Widows plc 25446.482 18414.102 1228.229 805.266 25.4% 25.4%
Standard Life Ass6 56950.710 44477.715 1244.827 1792.281 20.6% 20.6%
Sun Alliance & Lon Ass 9838.429 134.959 8648.770 499.485 350.000 384.107 8.6% 4.8%
Sun Life Assurance 12660.650 17.130 10809.767 163.904 497.032 11.0% 11.0%
Total 463971.744 3455.226 365374.555 16152.861 2276.497 15162.367 19.1% 18.5%
Source: companies' returns under the Insurance Companies Regulations.
1 Free assets ratio = (lines 21 + 22 + 31 minus lines 23, 24 and 41)/(lines 23 and 24)
where excluding implicit items, line 31 is omitted (no company used implicit items other than future profits)
2 Formerly CGU Life Ass
3 The figures are prior to demutualisation
4 The 1999 comparison is with National Provident Institution
5 The 1999 comparison is with Scottish Widows' Fund & Life Ass Society

6 Year-end 15 November; otherwise, figures are at year-end 31 December

Download Excel file

Nottingham University Business School Centre for Risk & Insurance Studies The University of Nottingham