What role for hypothecated taxation in financing public policies?
Is there a role for hypothecated (earmarked) taxation in the funding of public services? Those who support hypothecation suggest that earmarked taxes provide a clearer mechanism for public references to be brought to bear on the political process. Opponents suggest that tax earmarking is a deceit based on fiscal illusion, and that a move to hypothecation is merely window-dressing to disguise potentially unpopular tax rises. What is the likely economic impact of tax hypothecation? Is there any evidence to suggest that hypothecation can offer positive economic benefits, either in the form of increased revenues, or in an improvement in social wellbeing? Are there any lessons to be drawn from past experiences of tax earmarking?

Related publications:

Earmarked Taxation and Political Competition by Vincent Anesi. Journal of Public Economics, 90, pp. 679-701. 2006.

[HTML link ]
Economic Incentives and Tax Hypothecation by Alan Duncan and Andrew Jones. CPE Working Paper 2/04. June 2003.

[download ]
Hypothecated Taxes and NHS Funding by Andrew Jones and Alan Duncan, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 3, pp.1-2.(editorial). October 1998.

[HTML link ]

centre
The effectiveness of tax credit policies in promoting employment
Unemployment durations and subsequent labour market outcomes
International convergence in public welfare policies
Optimal design of tax credit and welfare systems
Hypothecated taxation and public policy finance
back to CPE research...
Back to top
home | research | people | publications | news & events | phd students | links | contacts