MATCH

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
E-mail Print PDF

Gossage-Worrall, R., Craven, M. P., Owen, V. and Clift, M., Healthcare Innovation and Technology Evaluation Centre (HITEC), Inditherm patient warming mattresses assessment report, October 2010. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&o=52387 (see also: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=folder&o=52383 ). Published NICE guidance now available Inditherm patient warming mattress for the prevention of inadvertent hypothermia, MTG7, August 2011: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/MTG7

Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing. Evidence review: Rapid tests for tetanus immunity. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency; 2010. CEP10001. (Lu B., Craven M., Morgan S., Clark D.).

Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing. Economic Report: Rapid tests for tetanus immunity. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency; 2010. CEP10002. (Craven M., Clark D., Lu B., Morgan S.). Associated model in Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing. Interactive model: Rapid tests for tetanus immunity. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency; 2010. CEP10002-I. (Craven M.)

Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing, Evidence Review: Vacuum Assisted Closure® therapy. CEP08017. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency; 2008.(Hammond C. and Clift M. MATCH contribution to economic evaluation review by Craven M.)

Craven M., Morgan S., Eatock J., Young T., Steuten T. & Buxton M. Assessing the value of Medical Devices, MATCH_Assessing_the_Value_of_Medical_Devices_070601, MATCH Discussion Document, June 2007.

Craven M. P., Davey, S. M. and Martin, J. L., Factors influencing wider acceptance of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) technologies for Total Joint Arthroplasty, MATCH_CAOS_Review_December2005_Craven_MP, December 2005.

Martin, J., Crowe J., Murphy E. and Norris, B., Methods to Capture User Perspectives in the Medical Device Technology Cycle: A Review of the Engineering and Ergonomics Literature, in MATCH Deliverable 6 - Methods To Capture User Perspectives in the Medical Device Technology Life Cycle: A Review of the Literature In Health Care, Social Science, and Engineering & Ergonomics, Part C: P3 D6 V3.0_Nott_051025, May 2005. Available from This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Robinson, I., Shah, S. G. S., Ram, M. B., Browne, N., Grocott, P., Weir, H., Crowe, J., Martin, J., Murphy, E. and Norris, B. MATCH Deliverable 10 - MATCH Guide towards User Involvement in Medical Device Technology Assessment, P3 D10 V3 051025, May 2005. Available from This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Robinson, I., Shah, S. G. S., Ram, M. B., Browne, N., Grocott, P., Weir, H., Crowe, J., Martin, J., Murphy, E. and Norris, B., MATCH Deliverable 19 - Methodological Issues for the Investigation of Methods to Elicit User Perspectives and Requirements in Medical Device Development, P3 D19 V3 051025, May 2005. Available from This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Johal, S. and Williams, H., MATCH Deliverable 3, Decision-making methods that could be used to assess the value of medical devices, P1 D3 V2.0 051025, March 2005. Available from This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Health Industries Task Force (HITF), Better health through partnership: a programme for action, 17/11/2004. Morgan S. and Craven, M. were participants in HITF Working Group 2: Research & development and industrial base; Little Working Group: Assessment methodologies. See also HITF Strategic Implementation Group (SIG) report, Innovation for health: Making a difference, March 2007.

Last Updated on Monday, 09 January 2012 16:04