Browse keywords: Learning outcomes

Previous / Next

Deep learning: why when and how?

Lucy Fairclough (School of Molecular Medical Sciences).

Background

There are numerous learning styles described in the literature. In this study two of these different approaches to learning were examined; surface learning and deep learning. Many core differences exist between these learning styles, but primarily deep learning should encourage the students to understand the subject, not just memorise the basics of the subject, which is the case in surface learning. This is done through active engagement of dialogue between the teacher and the student and not through passive (or remote) learning. The outcome of deep learning is thus an ability to assimilate the subject matter and not just memorisation to obtain competence (i.e. pass exams).

Methods

There are many ways in which students can be encouraged to adopt the deep approach to learning. Three such methods are through establishing learning outcomes, through a variety of different teaching methods (e.g. student participation and teacher led activities), and through appropriate assessment. The effectiveness of these approaches was examined on a group of MSc students during a lecture entitled ‘Introduction to Laboratory Experimentation’. This lecture was important in terms of student progression into the laboratory and it was therefore essential that the students fully understood everything that was covered in the lecture and did not forget it as soon as they left the room. For this purpose it was important to ensure that the students did not take the surface approach to learning but adopted the deep approach to learning.

A worksheet was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching session. In addition an evaluation form was used to obtain feedback on the teaching approaches used.

Results

After the lecture the students completed the worksheet and did very well, with marks ranging from 57% to 93% (average mark 73%). The feedback from the evaluation form was also positive but informative and has led to further development of this lecture (see below).

Conclusion

The evidence from the worksheet marks indicated that the students left the session with a better understanding of laboratory calculations.

Reflection

The main limitation to this study was proving that deep learning was achieved. However, the students progressed into their laboratory projects and did very well. A laboratory day has now been introduced to take place the day after the lecture to re-in-force the lecture material covered.

Resource 10 of 70
Paper presented at the University's Fifth Learning & Teaching conference (September, 2004).
227 views on campus, 5113 views in total
Staff on campus who looked at Deep learning: why… also viewed

Understanding evaluation: SET SEM and the student learning ... "Student evaluation procedures play a key role across the HE sector in gauging …"   (William Bowden et al.; Sep 2008)

Teaching delivery methods - assessing a novel approach to a ... "The Nottingham School of Veterinary Medicine and Science is the first new veterinary …"   (Neil Foster et al.; Sep 2007)

Also viewed auto-updated daily

Deep learning: why… also in
Next resource

Defining a critical curriculum: UCAS admissions and ... "This project will explore the relationship between undergraduate admissions and …"   (Daniel Grimley; Jan 2004)

Previous resource

Dealing with information overload: student teach thy self. "The Biomedical Sciences are subjects that are or appear to be heavily dependent on…"   (Ian Spendlove; Sep 2005)

Teaching at Nottingham © Copyright The University of Nottingham
This page: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/browse/keyword/12/deeplear203/
Printed: 06:41 pm, Monday 28th May 2012