Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) cognatocompressus Forel
Type locality "Africa"
- possibly Egypt (Camponotus rubripes Drury C.
cognato-compressus, Forel, 1886f: 143, 150, 151 (footnote); Forel,
1904b: 379 [r. Camponotus maculatus r. cognato-compressus Forel], worker, queen & male; raised
to species under name xerxes, Pisarski, 1967: 414); junior
synonym xerxes (Camponotus maculatus F., r. Xerxes
n. st., Forel, 1904f: 424, worker & queen; Karavaiev, 1910b: 9 [Camponotus maculatus thoracicus
var. xerxes Forel, 1904f],
soldier and synonymy - wrongly as senior; Forel, 1913d: 434, male,
without description) from Iran;
all
forms described .
|
Forel's (1886f) description is at ; the specimens were
earlier described (under cognatus) in his (1879a) paper - the
text is at . Forel's (1904b: 379)
report from Iran etc., is at . Forel's (1904f)
description of xerxes is at . Karaviev's (1910b) note
and description of the male is at .
|
The overall feature from Forel's several pieces, is of a
form
that is larger and matt relative to maculatus s.s. Legs and
antennae relatively short and slender. The head with very fine
coriaceous sculpture, giving a matt appearance; with the gaster often
somewhat shiny. The specimens were from Egypt and Tunisia. His (1904f)
brief note on xerxes gives that as wholly black, whereas the cognatocompressus
from Africa had the alitrunk and even part of the gaster
reddish-yellow. In the earlier work (1886f) he noted the soldiers were
larger TL ca 15 mm) than any Camponotus
maculatus. It does not appear to be known from Sub-Saharan
Africa.
Bolton (1995: 93) noted that cognatocompressus
(published 31.iii.1904) was the prior name to xerxes (published
23.xii.1904); he listed but appeared to discount the elevation
to species by Pisarski (1967). The latter was accepted by
Collingwood
(1985: 283) and Collingwood & Agosti (1996: 375) - citing Forel
(1904f: 424, with the year wrongly given as 1894); given as a large
species, almost wholly dark/black, without any gular hairs. They make
no reference to cognatocompressus.
On Camponotus
maculatus thoracicus F. var. xerxes
For. (1894f), Emery (1908a:195) noted typical "Persien" majors as
mainly black, with legs brown, and funiculus, coxae and tarsi rust-red;
TL 14 mm, head 4.3 X 4, scape 3.7 and hind tibia 5.0.
In his synonymic catalogue, Emery (1925b: 99) listed Camponotus compressus (Fabricius)
subsp. thoracica (Fabricius)
var. xerxes Forel (1904f:
424), with synonyms C. maculatus
thoracicus, var. xerxes,
Emery (1908a) and C. maculatus
cognato-compressus, Forel (1904b: 379).
Pisarski (1967) used Camponotus
xerxes Forel, 1904 (citing Camponotus
maculatus xerxes Forel, 1904: 379 (i.e. Forel, 1904b) but his
text was no more than a record of occurrence in Afghanistan.
|
In a key,
Radchenko (1996: 1201, in Russian) listed C. xerxes Forel (= C. compressus irakensis Menozzi,
syn. n.). Menozzi's (1927)
description of irakensis is at .
The original Forel note stated the major of the true compressus form Calcutta had the
head with consistently more convex sides than the related forms from
Africa The specimen shown below from Egypt has the narrower head
and generally lighter reddish colour he gave for cognatocompressus.
BT has received specimens of Camponotus
compressus from the Maldives that have led him to separate out
forms from the Indian sub-continent and irakensis from the
confusion of Mediterranean and North African forms. The group
probably includes C. xerxes
perhaps as a junior synonym of C.
compressus.
The Camponotus
compressus webpage can be seen at http://antbase.org/ants/africa/camponotus/camponotus_compressus/camponotus_compressus.htm
|
For comparison, Emery's (1893f) description of Camponotus
adenensis can be seen on the linked page, with images of specimens from Sinai. Although generally like
"compressus", i.e. later revised to cognatocompressus";
this has relatively shorter scapes, SI 0.85; there are no
"aiguillons" or short setae on the lower margin of the tibiae; the
petiole scale has a rounded upper margin.
|
Possibly illustrated by Savigny (Audouin, J.-V. 1825-27: Plate 20
Fig 2). See also the composite at the bottom of this page, where the overall proportions even down to eye size are a good match.
|
Egypt
Records - from an unspecified
location, possibly "Oasis de
Barych", in Forel (1879a).
The photomontage is of specimens from Zaranik, N. Sinai, E 34°26' N
30°39'; 4.v.2003, collected by Mostafa Sharaf; this has CI 89, distinct
setae on lower margin of hind tibiae and a sharp summit to the petiole
scale. Other images can be seen in the folder at -
Sharaf list, as adenensis - Zaranik (North
Sinai),
13.ix.2002 (1); Edfu temple (Aswan), 5.iii.2003 (1); Shalatein, Gebel
Elba, 23.i.2000 (2); Abu Ramad, G.Elba, 26.i.2000 (2), Leg. Dr.Hassan
H. Fadl (SHC); xerxes - Wadi Sedr (South Sinai), 10.iii.1998
(6) Leg.Dr.M.S.Abdel-Dayem (SHC). Local distribution: Cairo and Sinai
(Finzi, 1936).
|
The
photomontage is
of
a media worker from Egypt;
collected at St Katherine's Protectorate, Sinai, 2010, by Amy Shepherd.
Other images can be
seen in the folder at - .
|
The
photomontage is
of
a minor worker from St Katherine's Protectorate, Sinai, 2010, by Amy
Shepherd.
|
Composite of the Savigny Plate 20 Fig 2 and the above major worker.
|
|