Pheidole orientalis Emery - new status
MAJOR
MINOR
Type location "the Orient" (Pheidole
pallidula subsp. arenarum Ruzsky var. orientalis,
Emery, 1915j: 230, the pallidula of Ruzsky, 1905: 643,
illustrated, all forms; Müller, 1923: 69, soldier &
worker).
Ruszky's (1905) description orientalis (as pallidula)
& arenarum is at
.
Emery (1915j) gave an illustrated note on orientalis &
arenarum, this is at
.
Mayr (1880: 38) wrote in his note on "Pheidole pusilla"
how he regarded P. pallidula as known from southern Europe
and Algeria, whereas P. pusilla was cosmopolitan into the
south European peninsulas, with soldiers that had long propodeal
spines being P. pusilla; the note is at
.
|
Emery
(1915j: 229) emphasised that the type form was not found in Asia,
and Ruszky was wrong, what Ruszky described as pallidula
was an undescribed form. Emery called that orientalis and
regarded it as very close to the Ruszky subspecies arenarum.
He noted also the identity of "Pheidole pusilla"
of Mayr (1877, 1880, Fedtschenko voyage to Turkestan) and megacephalo-pallidula
of Emery & Forel (1979) were probably of this eastern form.
Emery had not seen those reported from Egypt or from the Balkans.
Emery (1915j) noted the minor of arenarum and its
variety orientalis had the head widely truncate
posteriorly, with more rounded posterior angles; the scape
surpassed the occipital border by one-third of its own length,
e.g. much more than in the type form minor. The pedicel was like
the type but sometimes the propodeal spines were longer. Dark
brown or chestnut brown; the major head was lighter, brownish
yellow-red. On orientalis he drew attention to the sides
of the head being more cuvred than in arenarum,
Specimens from the "Orient" were all or the "plus
claire" paler orientalis variety. He reported
specimens sent to him from the Adriatic are by Dr K Wolf, where
the paler type form was found in the northern Trieste area but
specimens from the southern Umago and Rovigno were all of the dark
orientalis variety |