Department of Classics and Archaeology
   
   
  

If you wish to get in touch with our administrative staff, please see the admin staff contact page.

Image of Michael Wuk

Michael Wuk

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Arts

Contact

Research Summary

My research primarily regards the period of Late Antiquity (broadly defined as the late third to late sixth centuries AD), in particular the military, diplomatic, and social history of this period.… read more

Current Research

My research primarily regards the period of Late Antiquity (broadly defined as the late third to late sixth centuries AD), in particular the military, diplomatic, and social history of this period. My thesis focuses upon these interests in relation to the practice of oath-swearing in various later Roman contexts, namely in the army, bureaucracy, diplomacy, and Christian Church.

Several ancient authors, such as Procopius of Caesarea and Theophylact Simocatta, refer to oath-taking as a significant matter that aided societal relationships, but also state that, despite its importance, the practice was often disregarded and had little efficacy. Although oaths to some extent still exist in the modern West, few of us regularly come into contact with oath-swearing and it rarely possesses the same meaning as it did in Roman society. As a result, oaths in antiquity have received less attention than other areas of the Roman world, particularly in Late Antiquity, and modern scholarship has often disregarded the practice as an empty ritual. Nevertheless, oath-taking was a frequent part of everyday life in the Roman world; soldiers and bureaucrats took oaths of allegiance to the emperor, merchants affirmed that their goods were correctly priced, those undertaking mandatory (and often onerous) municipal services swore they would complete their duties, and litigants confirmed the truth of their evidence on oath.

Certain developments arising during the later Roman empire raised the profile of swearing in various contexts to new heights and, consequently, this period is a particularly fruitful avenue for examining this practice. Late Antiquity began with frequent upheavals which resulted in greater military and political instability. Increased pressure was thereby placed upon the allegiances of soldiers and civilians to the emperor. Alongside this instability, a series of territorial losses throughout the fifth and sixth centuries in combination with growing external threats had weakened the geopolitical position of the empire. In this environment, diplomacy and the various associated rituals assumed even more significance than they possessed previously. Oaths played a vital role in these areas, whether confirming loyalty to a ruler or reinforcing adherence to treaties. Of course, the major change that characterised Late Antiquity was the increasing pervasiveness of Christianity in Roman society. Given that the process of swearing included invocation of the divine, this change naturally affected the practice.

With these considerations in mind, my thesis examines some of the contexts in which swearing took place and discusses the varying roles that oaths possessed throughout Late Antiquity. The third to sixth centuries were a crucial transitional period between the ancient and medieval worlds; in this environment, the oaths maintaining certain institutions exhibited continuities and changes in their formulation and usage, both of which would have then had an impact upon the perceptions and purposes of these promises. This raises several questions. Firstly, how did oath-taking adapt in formulation and procedure to suit the circumstances of Late Antiquity? Did their core features remain unchanged or were some of these sworn promises late antique innovations? In either of these scenarios, why was this the case? What were the envisioned purposes of these promises and what effects, intended or not, did they have? And to what extent can we determine that they were therefore efficacious? As swearing involved several parties who viewed the ritual from different standpoints, they would have been perceived differently by the groups involved. Emperor, soldier, bureaucrat, civilian, and religious adherent would have different perceptions of swearing in specific contexts, as would those who acted as recipients and those who swore. These will be examined in relation to various contexts of swearing, to examine both attitudes towards and the effects of these oaths. The aim is not to provide comprehensive coverage, which is beyond the constraints of a thesis of this length, nor a solely technical analysis on how and when oaths were formed. The purpose of this thesis is to investigate several contexts of swearing - namely, military, bureaucratic, diplomatic, and the Christian Church - in order to discuss later Roman society through the under-exploited direction of oath-taking.

Department of Classics and Archaeology

University of Nottingham
University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD

Contact details