PAEDIATRIC ALTERED CONSCIOUS LEVEL GUIDELINE

HOME

AIMS

SCOPE

CLINICAL QUESTIONS

EVIDENCE-BASED SEARCH

DELPHI PROCESS

RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMENTS

PARTICIPANTS

DRAFT GUIDELINE

 

DELPHI PROCESS

 

 

Guidelines should ideally be based on the current evidence available. When evidence is lacking it is important to identify and critically appraise other levels and sources of evidence and use this information to produce recommendations. Although not as strong as evidence-based recommendations, so long as the development process is transparent to the guideline users these other sources of recommendations can be very helpful in bridging the gaps in evidence-based guidelines.

 

Consensus methods can be used where robust evidence is lacking as a means by which the evidence available can be combined with clinical acumen and experience to provide a practical and usable clinical tool. One way of producing a recommendation is for a single person’s opinion to be written down based on their own personal experiences. This recommendation would not be accepted by many clinicians as their experiences may differ. Another way is to gather a group of experts around a table and ask for them to write a recommendation. Group dynamics often insure that the person with the loudest voice will have their viewpoint heard and the recommendation may again be based on an individual’s opinion or a small group.

 

A Delphi process (named after the Greek oracle at Delphi) allows a large panel of interested parties to have their opinions registered anonymously, analysed, and then fed back to the same panel for further consideration. This way the most junior opinion is given the same credit as the most senior one. When the whole panel results are reviewed either one is at liberty to change their original opinion or not (depending upon whether the group has helped them reconsider their initial position or not). Consensus may be reached on specific questions after one, two or three rounds of the Delphi panel or indeed it may never be reached. If no consensus is reached then a specific recommendation will be difficult to make as opinion on the matter is so divided. The Delphi panel process is probably the most robust consensus method used in guideline development at this present time.

 

 

A Delphi panel will be used in this guideline for recommendation formation where robust evidence is lacking. The same Delphi panel will be used for both modules of the guideline and will be established after the systematic review of the literature has been performed.

 

 

The Delphi process methods will be published before the questionnaires are sent out to the panel and the results will be published after all rounds have been completed.


 

Delphi Panel

 

Round one statements

 

Round two statements

 

Round three statements