This paper examines the extent of agreement between some recent exchange rate classification schemes, and also assesses the merits of some continuous measures of exchange rate flexibility. There is a probability of between 18 and 28 percent that a peg in one classification scheme is coded as a float in a different scheme, or vice versa. This probability is much smaller for the tightest forms of peg and the most volatile floats. An appropriately selected numerical index of exchange rate flexibility is potentially very useful.
Download the PDF of this paper
Michael Bleaney and Mo Tian
View all CFCM discussion papers | View all School of Economics featured discussion papers
Sir Clive Granger BuildingUniversity of NottinghamUniversity Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD
+44 (0)115 951 5620
Connect with the University of Nottingham through social media and our blogs.
Campus maps | More contact information | Jobs
Browser does not support script.