Assistant Professor in Political Theory, Faculty of Social Sciences
I joined Nottingham in September 2017. Currently, I lead the interdisciplinary Forced Marriage Project at the University of Nottingham's Rights Lab Beacon of Excellence. I am working on conceptual analysis of the links between forced and servile marriage and slavery, using historical analyses by 19th century feminists as a starting point.
My D.Phil thesis looked at J.S. Mill's surprising claim to be a socialist: I completed it in 2010. Since then, I have been teaching analytical political theory and the history of political thought at the University of Oxford (2010-2013) and the University of Warwick (2013-2017), working on the book manuscript of my doctorate, publishing articles on Mill's socialism, and working on a project concerning his authorial relationship with Harriet Taylor Mill.
In 2018 I started a new project with the Rights Labs, a University of Nottingham Beacon of Excellence, on Forced and Servile Marriage. I lead an interdisciplinary team concerned with the meaning and experience of forced and servile marriage globally; measuring its prevalence more-accurately; understandings its causes and consequences; and developing more-effective interventions aimed at achieving the United Nations' station goal of ending it by 2030.
My previous research mainly looked at the political philosophy of John Stuart Mill, especially his connections to pre-Marxist socialism (particularly that of Robert Owen, Charles Fourier, Victor Considerant, Henri Saint-Simon and Louis Blanc). I also work on in the nature of his intellectual relationship with Harriet Taylor Mill (whom he credited as his co-author), and in her independent status as a political philosopher.
In Autumn 2019 I am convening the Placements Module, and teaching on 'Democracy and its Critics'. In Spring 2020 I am on research leave.
I am currently developing a long-term multi-disciplinary project on forced and servile marriage - its meaning, experience, prevalence, causes, consequences and how to end it. I start from the… read more
From September 2018, I am working with a team of six researchers in a project to increase the presence of ethnic diversity in the curricula of politics and philosophy (also referred to as 'decolonising' the curriculum) in an effort to achieve greater representation of a wider range of perspectives, debates, and interpretations of the world. Entitled 'Represent! Regularising ethnic presence in the curriculum', the project will run for two years.
The project is funded by the Birmingham-Nottingham Education Partnership Fund. The project team is formed of:
- Dr Helen Williams (principal investigator), School of Politics and IR, University of Nottingham
- Dr Helen McCabe, School of Politics and IR, University of Nottingham
- Dr Andrew Fisher, Department of Philosophy, University of Nottingham.
- Dr Peter Kerr, Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham
- Dr Emma Foster, Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham
- Dr Vipin Chauhan, Project Research Assistant/Associate
This project will take a curriculum-based approach to the undergraduate attainment gap between white and BAME students in philosophy and politics.
Descriptive representation matters, including in the curriculum, and mainstreaming perspectives that are not the traditional white, European, middle class, male approaches is very important for increasing retention, engagement, and attainment of other demographics. The importance of mainstreaming more diverse perspectives has been highlighted under many guises, starting with critical pedagogy in the 1960s and proliferating into other headings, such as hidden curriculum, critical race pedagogy, and more recently decolonisation of the curriculum. Each of these headings addresses a slightly different aspect of the same underlying phenomenon: the decisions we make about what we teach and how we teach it, as well as the expectations our students have, can either foster inclusion or perpetuate social and ethnic inequalities.
Recently, decolonisation (or ethnic diversification) of the curriculum has received considerable press, but there is a clear call for a coherent methodology for decolonisation. The project will start with a review of the ways that educationalists across the world have undertaken diversification to propose a methodology for systematically improving representation without assuming unlimited knowledge and resources of those trying to decolonise their curriculum. Alongside this, we will audit what we already do, uncovering the implicit and explicit curriculum. In the second year, the main activity will be to work with staff and students to identify examples, authors, readings, and topics to ensure greater visibility of BAME authors and ideas in the mainstream curriculum, including diversifying our expectations in assessments. The Department of Philosophy has already begun such a review; Peter Kerr and Emma Foster (Birmingham) have undertaken a similar review for gender.
The project will result in the incorporation of more BAME authors and themes as part of the core curricula in the participating departments. The resources (website with database, curriculum changes) will provide a blueprint to expand the changes beyond the participant departments.
I am currently developing a long-term multi-disciplinary project on forced and servile marriage - its meaning, experience, prevalence, causes, consequences and how to end it. I start from the question of definition, exploring the conceptual links between forced and servile marriage (counted as 'conventional servitudes' and 'institutions and practices similar to slavery' in the 1956 Supplementary Convention on Slavery and the Slave Trade) and slavery - particularly how lack of consent, which is seen as a hallmark of forced marriage is connected to the hallmark of slavery, the exercise of powers associated with property rights over one person by another. I take analyses provided by feminists authors writing in the context of earlier waves of abolitionist activity of marriage as a form of slavery as a useful starting point, as well as looking to map the existing legislation on forced and servile marriage globally, and the definitions currently in use in international statues and domestic legislation. I presented an early paper on this in Johannesburg and Karlsruhe in 2018, and am presenting again on a similar theme in Bonn in July 2019.
I am also finishing off the manuscript of my book John Stuart Mill: Socialist (under contract with McGill--Queens University Press), and on which I gave related papers in Nottingham, Paris, York and Boston in 2018. I am also working on Mill's co-authoring relationship with his wife, Harriet Taylor Mill. I presented on this topic in Lancaster (October 2017), London (February 2018), New Orleans (March 2018), and Boston (August 2018). I am investigating the extent to which we should think of Mill's body of work as 'his', 'hers' or 'theirs' and what this would mean for his, and her, status as a thinker in the 'canon' of Western political theory; and link this to other work being done on (particularly female) collaboration and co-authorship. Among other things, I hope this speaks to the demand to liberate the curriculum, and restore forgotten women their rightful place in history. This is a key part of another piece of research in which I am currently involved (funded by the Birmingham and Nottingham Education Partnership) on trying to end the BAME attainment gap through diversifying the curriculum and making ethnic diversity mainstream in our teaching.
My D.Phil thesis looked at Mill's somewhat surprising assertion of being 'under the general designation of Socialist'. I considered this in its historical context (particularly of 'utopian' socialism such as that of Robert Owen and his followers, Henri Saint-Simon and his followers the Saint-Simonians); Charles Fourier and Victor Consideration; and Louis Blanc, Philipe Buchez and other cooperative socialists in France) and found it to be a plausible claim. Mill's socialism is akin, but not identical to, many of these 'utopian' socialists. I also considered his socialism in a more conceptual fashion (particularly given John Rawls' claim that Mill was a supporter of 'property-owning democracy' rather than 'liberal socialism') and found that Mill's commitments to the free development of individuality; equality; social harmony; progress and general utility make him plausible a 'liberal socialist'.
Since completing my D.Phil I have been working on Mill's feminism and how his view of distributive justice and the 'ideal' society can help us unravel some of his oft-criticised statements regarding 'ideal' marriage in 'The Subjection of Women'. I have also done further work on his socialism, particularly focusing on his relationship with Fourierism, an over-looked element of his socialism, and on his concept of the 'ideal' as the North Star by which we ought to navigate current social reform.
My future research will increasingly focus on forced marriage, and how to end it, along with other forms of modern slavery, by 2030.
HELEN MCCABE, 2016. Harriet Taylor Mill. In: CHRIS MACLEOD and DALE MILLER, eds., A Companion to Mill Wiley-Blackwell. 112-125
HELEN MCCABE, 2015. John Stuart Mill, Utility and the Family: Attacking ‘the Citadel of the Enemy’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie/International Review of Philosophy. 272(2), 225-235
HELEN MCCABE, 2015. JOHN STUART MILL’S ANALYSIS OF CAPITALISM AND THE ROAD TO SOCIALISM. In: CASEY HARRISON, ed., A New Social Question : Capitalism, Socialism and Utopia. Cambridge Scholars. 8-22
HELEN MCCABE, 2014. John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Persuasion Informal Logic. 34(1), 38-61
HELEN MCCABE, 2012. Mill and Socialism: A Reply to Capaldi The Tocqueville Review. 33(1), 145-164