article

Key failings in government’s approach to Covid-19 preparations and emergency response, academics find

Thursday, 07 May 2020

The UK government made key failings in their strategic preparations and emergency response to coronavirus and this, in turn, undermined the NHS’s ability to cope with the crisis, new research suggests.

These are the findings recently published in a research paper for the Journal of Risk Research by academics from Cass Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Nottingham University Business School and Vlerick Business School.

The researchers conducted an extensive review of literature focusing on key organisational resilience research, allowing them to identify the ‘good, the bad and the ugly’ of preparedness in readiness and response to the current pandemic.

The academics found that the NHS’s resilience to the pandemic was compromised by an over-reliance on ‘lean production’ and ‘just in time’ continuity planning. This left NHS stockpiles short of vital supplies and capacity for personal protective equipment (PPE), ventilators and testing.

They argue that ‘strategic redundancy’ and ‘slack in the system’ could have left the NHS much better prepared to avoid the late ‘ramping up’ of capacity by government health officials in the face of the immense stresses and demands placed on global supply chains by a pandemic.

The researchers suggest this flawed strategy was not simply due to a lack of foresight. Instead they suggest that the UK government failed to adequately take account of known threats and clear signals of systemic weaknesses in the event of a pandemic, uncovered by emergency exercises such as Operation Cygnus, the three-day simulation in 2016 which focused on the response and planning to a flu pandemic involving government and public health bodies.

The researchers suggest that, as the UK undergoes a period of adjustment in response to Covid-19, a new independent body should be set up to take responsibility for future national emergency preparedness free from political interference.

Lead researcher Dr Cormac Bryce, Cass Business School, said the paper has implications for future inquiries into the UK government’s handling of the pandemic.  He said it also highlights the need for new institutional arrangements to strengthen independence and transparency at the science-policy interface between expert advice, government decision-making, and provision for future pandemic threats.

“Benjamin Franklin suggested that by failing to prepare we should prepare to fail. We are witnessing the tragic consequences of such governmental failures - an overreliance on ‘just in time’ delivery amongst other factors has led to inadequate stockpiling of PPE and ventilators. Even though the warnings to prepare were there for those willing to look and act for years” he said.

“This inability to develop resilience in the face of Covid-19 has hampered the adaptation to the pandemic due to the slow upscaling of testing for key workers and the vulnerable in care homes - those most at risk."

The levels of preparedness and crisis management have been quite shocking, particularly following the conclusions of the leaked Exercise Cygnus report published by the Guardian today. The risk management and supply chain communities are shaking their heads in disbelief at how ill-prepared the UK was for a not entirely unpredictable event.
Dr Jamie Wardman, co-author and Assistant Professor in Risk Management at Nottingham University Business School

Dr Wardman continued: "Once the COVID-19 pandemic moved into the crisis phase it was always going to be difficult to address extreme demands and resolve inadequacies in health and social care supply and capacity for PPE, ventilators and virus testing. The events of recent weeks have confirmed this with numerous delays, aborted contracts, and the rejection of substandard equipment. The planning arrangements for future pandemic preparedness clearly need significant reform."

The paper Resilience in the face of uncertainty: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic is published in the Journal of Risk Research as part of a forthcoming rapid response special issue providing international perspectives on Covid-19 and the contributions of risk science to the pandemic.

The authors are:

  • Dr Cormac Bryce, Cass Business School
  • Dr Patrick Ring, Glasgow School for Business and Society
  • Dr Jamie Wardman, Nottingham University Business School
  • Dr Simon Ashby, Vlerick Business School

Story credits

More information is available from Dr Jamie Wardman, Assistant Professor of Risk Management, Nottingham University Business School at jamie.wardman@nottingham.ac.ukor Katie Andrews in the Press Office at the University of Nottingham at katie.andrews@nottingham.ac.uk 

Katie-Andrews-2022-edited
Katie Andrews - Media Relations Manager for the Faculty of Social Sciences
Email: katie.andrews@nottingham.ac.uk
Phone: 0115 951 5751
Location:

Notes to editors:

About the University of Nottingham

Ranked 32 in Europe and 16th in the UK by the QS World University Rankings: Europe 2024, the University of Nottingham is a founding member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities. Studying at the University of Nottingham is a life-changing experience, and we pride ourselves on unlocking the potential of our students. We have a pioneering spirit, expressed in the vision of our founder Sir Jesse Boot, which has seen us lead the way in establishing campuses in China and Malaysia - part of a globally connected network of education, research and industrial engagement.

Nottingham was crowned Sports University of the Year by The Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide 2024 – the third time it has been given the honour since 2018 – and by the Daily Mail University Guide 2024.

The university is among the best universities in the UK for the strength of our research, positioned seventh for research power in the UK according to REF 2021. The birthplace of discoveries such as MRI and ibuprofen, our innovations transform lives and tackle global problems such as sustainable food supplies, ending modern slavery, developing greener transport, and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

The university is a major employer and industry partner - locally and globally - and our graduates are the second most targeted by the UK's top employers, according to The Graduate Market in 2022 report by High Fliers Research.

We lead the Universities for Nottingham initiative, in partnership with Nottingham Trent University, a pioneering collaboration between the city’s two world-class institutions to improve levels of prosperity, opportunity, sustainability, health and wellbeing for residents in the city and region we are proud to call home.

More news…

Media Relations - External Relations

The University of Nottingham
YANG Fujia Building
Jubilee Campus
Wollaton Road
Nottingham, NG8 1BB

telephone: +44 (0) 115 951 5798
email: pressoffice@nottingham.ac.uk