Predatory moneylending in developing countries is still rife, despite the introduction of low-interest ‘micro loans’ to help entrepreneurs in some of the world’s poorest countries.
Now, new research from experts at the University of Nottingham, Ningbo, China (UNNC), examines why this is.
In this research, published by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Dr Frithjof Arp from the Department of International Business and Management at UNNC, delves deeper into the ongoing debate about the effectiveness and sustainability of international microfinance initiatives to help alleviate poverty in some of the world’s poorest countries.
The paper looks at two studies in Indonesia that help explain why the poorest borrowers benefit less from formal microfinance than the less-poor, and why informal moneylending continues to thrive. Indonesia was chosen as a research setting because, along with Bangladesh, it is often held up as an example of widely available microfinance.
Microfinance gives entrepreneurs and small businesses in developing countries, who lack access to banking, access to affordable financial products. The hope is that this will help poor people out of poverty. Microfinance is widely viewed as a way to promote economic development, growth and a way for micro-entrepreneurs to take advantage of economic opportunities.
This new research indicates however, that microfinance initiatives can have unintended consequences. Microfinance can produce unintended entrepreneurship opportunities for borrowers, including informal intermediation. This means that some borrowers become the informal ‘middle-man’ between formal lenders and poorer micro-entrepreneurs.
Dr Arp says: “Informal moneylenders, including predatory loan sharks, are common in the world’s poor countries, despite the introduction of government-supported microfinance initiatives. This led us to ask – if there is strong competition for these kind of lenders, then why are they not being wiped out?
“In the UNCTAD article, we provide an overview of two studies into microfinance. From these, we can see that some borrowers who qualify more easily for formal microfinance are ‘splitting’ loans, to lend on to even poorer borrowers. The consequence of this informal intermediation is that the poorest of the poor micro-entrepreneurs benefit less than the less-poor, and so this reinforces socio-economic hierarchies and stratification in these countries.
“The spectrum of informal intermediation is quite wide, ranging from benign occasional intermediation (helping other poor borrowers) to malign and systematically deceptive intermediaries at the criminal ‘loan shark’ end of the spectrum. In addition, informal intermediation is just one of the management problems making formal microfinance initiatives less effective than they might be.
“We now need to develop measures on how these problems can be reduced and stop predatory lenders from taking advantage of poorer borrowers. Formal microfinance initiatives also need to improve their management processes.
“It appears that formal microfinance initiatives are overlooking fundamental questions of competition from informal lenders. In addition, previous research has often been conducted in a vacuum, attempting to assess these initiatives in isolation. Our methodology gathers information from three different sources: borrowers, formal and informal lenders.
“As expected, preliminary fieldwork conducted in Thailand indicates that informal intermediation occurs in that country, too. Further research on the topic of microfinance effectiveness requires collaborators in multiple additional countries.”
A full copy of the paper can be found here
To join the debate on microfinance effectiveness and help spread information on this important topic, please connect to this LinkedIn introduction
For further information and research collaboration, please contact:
Dr. Frithjof Arp - Frithjof.Arp@nottingham.edu.cn
— Ends —
Our academics can now be interviewed for broadcast via our Media Hub, which offers a Globelynx fixed camera and ISDN line facilities at University Park campus. For further information please contact a member of the Communications team on +44 (0)115 951 5798, email email@example.com or see the Globelynx website for how to register for this service.
For up to the minute media alerts, follow us on Twitter
Notes to editors:
The University of Nottingham is a research-intensive university with a proud heritage, consistently ranked among the world's top 100. Studying at the University of Nottingham is a life-changing experience and we pride ourselves on unlocking the potential of our 44,000 students - Nottingham was named University of the Year for Graduate Employment in the 2017 Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide, was awarded gold in the TEF 2017 and features in the top 20 of all three major UK rankings. We have a pioneering spirit, expressed in the vision of our founder Sir Jesse Boot, which has seen us lead the way in establishing campuses in China and Malaysia - part of a globally connected network of education, research and industrial engagement. We are ranked eighth for research power in the UK according to REF 2014. We have six beacons of research excellence helping to transform lives and change the world; we are also a major employer and industry partner - locally and globally.
Impact: The Nottingham Campaign, its biggest-ever fundraising campaign, is delivering the University’s vision to change lives, tackle global issues and shape the future. More news…