A colour photo of a woman wearing a blue top at a desk on the phone holding a baby in a white babygro sucking its thumb.

Report highlights serious gender inequality in TV industry during COVID pandemic

Monday, 06 September 2021

A new study by media experts at the University of Nottingham has revealed that gender inequality in the UK television industry has grown significantly worse because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hundreds of mothers took part in the study – ‘Locked Down and Locked Out’ – published today by the university’s Institute for Screen Industries Research. The work was carried out in collaboration with SMTJ and Telly Mums Network with Bectu, which represents 40,000 creative industry workers in the UK.

The report throws a spotlight on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the careers, finances and mental health of mothers working in unscripted UK television and makes a series of recommendations for broadcasters, commissioners, regulators, and policymakers. It concludes: ‘The COVID-19 pandemic and associated government lockdowns have been nothing short of a disaster for mothers working in the UK television sector.’

More than 500 mothers working in unscripted TV entertainment, documentary, sport, news and current affairs, reality TV, studio quiz shows and online or branded content production took part in the survey. They included women working in programme development and editorial, craft and technical departments, production, post-production, talent management, HR and studio-based staff.

They were asked about changes to their work patterns, home-schooling responsibilities, the sharing of childcare and their physical, mental and emotional wellbeing during the pandemic. Follow-up interviews were carried out with a demographically diverse sample of women who had had a range of pandemic experiences. The findings revealed multiple impacts on their lives, including:

  • Nearly half (49 percent) of survey respondents said they had been unable to accept work due to childcare related issues. Over 55 percent had been part of a production that was either cancelled or postponed and 54 percent said they had not been able to find enough work. Of the 523 people who completed our survey, 29 said they had been made redundant and 61 said they had been let go early from a contract.
  • During the pandemic many mothers in TV worked flexibly, often having to manage already gruelling workloads with increased childcare and housework. The continued significance
    of gendered expectations around childcare combined with a ‘lack of care’ culture within the industry, made this intolerable.
  • Nearly 80 percent of the mothers in our sample said that they had been responsible for most of the home-schooling and childcare in their household, even though there was an almost 50/50 split as to who was the main earner.
  • Many mothers had to juggle work and childcare, while others were unable to work because of childcare. The first group had fewer financial worries but suffered serious consequences to their well-being and mental health. The latter group suffered more from financial hardship, something that was compounded for freelancers, single parents, those from a minoritised racial or lower socio-economic background, and disabled mothers.
  • There was a lack of understanding and accommodation from employers for additional childcare responsibilities and ongoing uncertainty caused by the fragility of the school 'bubble' system. This was felt to be the natural extension of a pre-existing lack of understanding and accommodation for caring responsibilities outside work that characterises the television industry. There is a strong sense among mothers that the industry does not care.
  • 61 per cent of all respondents said they have seriously considered leaving the industry during the pandemic.
  • The pandemic was difficult for all mothers working in television. However, freelance mothers and those from minoritised racial groups were particularly vulnerable, often with lack of access to furlough and difficulty finding work that would accommodate additional child caring responsibilities. Over two thirds of the mothers that responded were self-employed or freelancers (72 percent) compared to just 22 percent who were in a permanent role.
  • Mothers felt they were treated as ‘disposable’ and often replaced by men or women without caring responsibilities, locked out from careers which have taken years to build.
  • Working from home has played a vital role in enabling mothers to cope with the demands of additional childcare and the intensive work patterns that characterise television labour. However, while flexible work patterns can play a significant role in helping to prevent mothers from dropping out of the industry, on its own it does nothing to disrupt the gendered assumptions around work and childcare that disadvantage mothers.

Some of the respondents’ comments bring into sharp relief the effects of the pandemic on their lives:

“The TV industry doesn’t care about freelancers, our mental well-being or our safety - we are disposable and it’s fundamentally rotten at its core.”

“Working in television has always been like balancing on a tightrope but COVID cut it in two.”

“At more than one point I considered ending my life.”

“There was no allowance made in the production schedule for the fact that I was teaching and caring for a 6-year-old while trying to run an edit from my kitchen table.”

“I am at a loss as to what to do. I am an educated, successful professional who feels like I have no options available and have been forced through a combination of factors to become a housewife. I love my career, but I fear that it will be impossible to continue unless opportunities and attitudes change towards mothers.”

Professor Helen Kennedy, School of Culture, Media and Visual Studies, University of Nottingham

Leading the study, Professor of Creative and Cultural Industries, Helen Kennedy, said: “Being a mother in television has always been accompanied by enormous difficulties related to the nature of the working practices and cultures that have become prevalent in the industry. The COVID-19 pandemic has shattered the already fragile and precarious networks of support upon which mothers relied to enable them to manage work and caring responsibilities, up to the point where for many it has become unbearable. The damage done to individual mothers and to the diversity of the television talent pool should shame the industry and be at the forefront of policy and debate about the recovery of creative sectors.”

The research team is recommending a range of actions to try to mitigate the effects of disrupted working lives of mothers in TV in the future. These include changes in attitudes of partners, colleagues and friends to the gender-biased burdens that continue to be placed on mothers; management training; flexible working patterns such as job-shares, home working and flexitime; programme budgets with built-in childcare provision and funding; better compliance to production company and regulators’ obligations to the Equality Act 2010 and motherhood being included in diversity and inclusivity debates within the industry.

The Locked Down and Locked Out project has been funded by the University of Nottingham and an AHRC Arts Impact Accelerator Grant. The full report is available here.

The research team included Professor Helen Kennedy, Dr Jack Newsinger, Assistant Professor in Cultural Industries at the University of Nottingham, Dr Rowan Aust is Research Fellow at the University of Huddersfield and Co-Director of Share My Telly Job and Dr Natalie Wreyford, Lecturer in Culture, Media and Creative Industries at King’s College London.

Story credits

For more information, please contact Professor Helen Kennedy, Department of Cultural, Media and Visual Studies, University of Nottingham via email or Emma Rayner, Media Relations Manager on 07738 291242 or

Emma Rayner - Media Relations Manager, Faculty of Arts
Phone: 0115 748 4413

Notes to editors:

The University of Nottingham

Our academics can now be interviewed for broadcast via our Media Hub, which offers a Quicklink fixed camera and ISDN line facilities at Jubilee campus. For further information please contact a member of the Press Office on +44 (0)115 951 5798, email

For up to the minute media alerts, follow us on Twitter

The University of Nottingham is a research-intensive university with a proud heritage. Studying at the University of Nottingham is a life-changing experience, and we pride ourselves on unlocking the potential of our students. We have a pioneering spirit, expressed in the vision of our founder Sir Jesse Boot, which has seen us lead the way in establishing campuses in China and Malaysia - part of a globally connected network of education, research and industrial engagement. Ranked 18th in the UK by the QS World University Rankings 2023, the University’s state-of-the-art facilities and inclusive and disability sport provision is reflected in its crowning as The Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide Sports University of the Year twice in three years, most recently in 2021. We are ranked seventh for research power in the UK according to REF 2021. We have six beacons of research excellence helping to transform lives and change the world; we are also a major employer and industry partner - locally and globally. Alongside Nottingham Trent University, we lead the Universities for Nottingham initiative, a pioneering collaboration which brings together the combined strength and civic missions of Nottingham’s two world-class universities and is working with local communities and partners to aid recovery and renewal following the COVID-19 pandemic.

More news…

Media Relations - External Relations

The University of Nottingham
C Floor, Pope Building (Room C4)
University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD

telephone: +44 (0) 115 951 5798