This unique interdisciplinary module introduces you to central issues in the Philosophy of History, which broadly examines both the nature of history itself and historical knowledge.
Together, we will critically assess some of the most influential philosophical accounts of the nature of the past and its phenomena. We may focus on issues such as whether history has a direction, progressivist and teleological accounts of history, necessity and contingency in history, the historicist rather than universalist positions on the status of human nature, the ontological status of historical objects, or the putative meaning of history.
Topics covered may include, but are not limited to, the connection between the possibility of historical laws, actor-centered philosophy of history, causal explanations, historical objectivity, or realism and anti-realism about the past.
However, the description of the module on our website for this year seems to have reverted to the previous version:
Since the nineteenth century, history (much like natural science) has become a subject for specialists, and professional historians are frequently located in universities. But what makes the increasingly sophisticated methods of modern historians appropriate? And what can we reasonably expect the practice of modern historical methods to deliver? How should historians choose the right methods given the wide remit of their enquiries into the human past?
This unique interdisciplinary module introduces you to these and a range of other tough questions in the philosophy of history that, broadly construed, critically examine the ways in which historians seek to link past and present in a discipline designed to deliver genuine historical knowledge.
Additional topics may include, but not be limited to:
- Models and theories of history
- Historical reasoning from evidence
- Abstraction and the possibility of historical laws
- Narrative and causal approaches to history
- Underdetermination and inference to best explanation